Company News - page 5

The Arbitration Court of the Kaluga Region decided in favor of Sojuzpatent’s client – Open Joint Stock Company “Obninskiy Kolbasniy Zavod” in a case on challenging the decision of the Federal Antimonopoly Service. The court upheld the decision of the Federal Antimonopoly Service according to which Open Joint Stock Company “Obninskiy Kolbasniy Zavod” does not violate antitrust legislation by using designation "Imperika". 
​​​​​​​The Court for Intellectual Property Rights ruled in favor of Sojuzpatent’s client – Hardy & Greys Limited (Great Britan) in a dispute on early termination of legal protection of Russian trademark No. 433727 regarding part of goods of classes 25 and 28 of the Nice Classification indicated in the trademark due to its non-use.
The Court for Intellectual Property Rights ruled in favor of Sojuzpatent’s client – Joint-Stock Company “Obninskiy Kolbasniy Zavod” in a case on recovery of compensation in the amount of 2 859 910 rubles for    infringement of Russian trademark No. 242227.
The Arbitration Court of the Kaliningrad Region decided in favor of Sojuzpatent’s client – SOREMARTEC S.A. (Luxemburg) in a trademark infringement case over the use of the Russian trademark No. 798984 ”Raffaello”.
The Chamber for Patent Disputes of the Federal Service for Intellectual Property decided in favor of Sojuzpatent’s client – ISHIDA CO. LTD (Japan) in a case challenging the validity of the Russian patent No 2550898. Patent holder was ordered to amend the claims. 
The Federal Service for Intellectual Property ruled in favor of Sojuzpatent’s client –  ORION CORPORATION  (Finland) in a case challenging the validity of the Russian trademark No. 347142  «Тригидрон» . The Federal Service for Intellectual Property invalidated in full the Russian trademark No. 347142 «Тригидрон».
The Ninth Arbitration Appeal Court ruled in favor of Sojuzpatent’s client – Purity Laboratories Ltd. (Ireland) in a trademark infringement case over the use of the Russian trademark No. 345776 ”Beverly Hills Formula” . The Ninth Arbitration Appeal Court revoked the Ruling of the Moscow Arbitration Court on the same case on termination of the proceedings of the case and ruled to forward the case for a new trial to the Arbitration Court of Moscow.
Moscow Arbitration Court ruled in favor of Sojuzpatent’s client – RENAULT s.a.s (France) in an administrative infringement case. The court recognized the infringement and decided to bring the offender to administrative responsibility according to part 1 of art. 14.10 of the Russian Administrative Offences Code, imposed an administrative fine and decided to confiscate the infringing goods.
Nizhny Novgorod District Court ruled in favor of Sojuzpatent’s client –  JSC "Khokhlomskaya Painting" (defendant) in a copyright protection case. The court completely rejected the plaintiff's claims against JSC "Khokhlomskaya Painting" on recognition of the exclusive right to the works of arts and crafts: polubasskaya spoon, fishing spoon, opolovnik large. The court also rejected the plaintiff's claims for recovery of the court costs in the amount of 80 000 rubles. 
The Board of the Chamber on Patent Disputes ruled in favor of Sojuzpatent’s client – Golden Lady Company S.p.A. ( Italy ) in a case related to invalidation in full of legal protection in the  Russian Federation  of the international trademark registration No. 951789.    
The Ninth Arbitration Appeal Court ruled in favor of Sojuzpatent’s client – CJS “Sandoz” in a Russian trademark ”MATRIX”  infringement case.
The Court for Intellectual Property Rights ruled in favor of Sojuzpatent’s client – Telefonaktiebolaget L.M. Ericsson (Sweden) in a patent RU 2223555 invalidation action. The court rejected plaintiff’s claims and recognized patent RU 2223555 as valid. Previously same decision has been taken by the Russian Patent Office.
The Fourteenth Arbitration Appeal Court ruled in favor of Sojuzpatent’s client – Renault s.a.s. (France) in a case regarding bringing LLC. "TechExpo" to administrative liability for unlawful use of designations confusingly similar to the international registration trademark No. 581303 the right holder of which is Renault s.a.s.
The Court for Intellectual Property Rights ruled in favor of Sojuzpatent’s client – LLC “Teva” in a cancellation action regarding Russian trademark registrations No. 208160, 253925, 258873, 263812, 265889 regarding goods of class 5 and services of classes 35 and 42 of Nice Classification because of their non-use during three years preceding the filing of the law suit.
The Court for Intellectual Property Rights ruled in favor of Sojuzpatent’s client – JSC "Special Design Bureau "Turbine" in a utility model patent RU 89632 invalidation action.
The Moscow Arbitration Court ruled in favor of Sojuzpatent’s client – Renault s.a.s. (France) in a case regarding bringing LLC. "RMS Auto" to administrative liability for unlawful use of designations confusingly similar to the international registration trademarks No. 603606, 1029976, 581303 the right holder of which is Renault s.a.s.
The Court for Intellectual Property Rights ruled in favor of Sojuzpatent’s client – JSC "Special Design Bureau "Turbine" in a patent invalidation case in part regarding indication of patent owner of the said patents.
The Ninth Arbitration Appeal Court ruled in favor of Sojuzpatent’s client – Gedeon Richter Nyrt. (Hungary) in a patent RU 2269342 infringement case.
The Moscow Arbitration Court ruled in favor of Sojuzpatent’s clients – Public Stock Company “Veropharm” and LLC “LANS- Pharm” in a patent RU 2134123 infringement case.
The Moscow Arbitration Court ruled in favor of Sojuzpatent’s client – HACHETTE FILIPACCHI PRESSE (France) in a trademark infringement case.