Portfolio management

Dr. Tamara S. Fomicheva

Deputy Managing Partner
Head of Patent Department

+7 (495) 221 8880
+7 (495) 221 8881
+7 (495) 221 8885
+7 (495) 221 8886
  • Holds Ph.D. degree in Chemistry;
  • Master’s degree of the Moscow Institute of Chemical Technology named after D.I. Mendeleev, engineer-chemist;
  • Diploma of the Russian State Institute of Intellectual Property protection, patent expert;
  • Diploma of the High School of foreign languages of the Ministry of the Foreign Economical Relations of the Russian Federation;
  • Patent Attorney of the Russian Federation (inventions, utility models);
  • Eurasian Patent Attorney;
  • Worked in the position of the Deputy Chief of the Organic Compounds Department of the Russian Patent Office, was a member of the Supreme Patent Chamber of the Russia Patent Office;
  • Worked in the position of research assistant in the Scientific and Research Institute ChimPolymer and IREA;
  • Author of more than 10 publications in the field of chemistry, including legal points;
  • Experience in the field of registration of the objects of chemistry, chemical technology in Russia and abroad including presenting interests of clients in administrative bodies;
  • Member of AIPPI, LES, Russian Patent Attorneys Association;
  • With Sojuzpatent since 1999;
  • Language – English. 
Company news
May 25 2017

Sojuzpatent’s team of ten professionals took part in the 139th INTA Annual Meeting in Barcelona, Spain. During the event, Sojuzpatent hosted a booth at the Convention Center.

Read more
Apr 28 2017

The Supreme Court of the Russian Federation refused to transfer the cassation appeal of the offender to the Judicial Board for Economic Disputes, thereby supporting the position of Sojuzpatent’s client - Renault S.A.S. (France)

Read more
Nov 29 2016

On November 28, 2016, the Presidium of the IP Court canceled the decision of the first instance in the case SIP-70/2016 and sent the case back for a new trial by a different panel of judges. The Presidium agreed with the arguments of Golden Lady Company S.p.A that the conclusions of the court of the first instance contradicted to the facts and case materials and that additional evidence, provided by the parties after administrative procedure, should be also taken into consideration by court. Also, the Presidium stated, that a Power of Attorney should clearly indicate the date when it is signed, and if a Notary just acknowledges the authentic signature, but does not confirm that this signature was put in his presence, the date of notarial certification cannot be the date of PoA. A PoA without a date is void. A power of attorney, having two different dates on it should be also considered void.

Read more

Read all news ї