News

Mar 23 2012
Sojuzpatent Participates in International Salon "Archimedes-2012"

Sojuzpatent participated in the 15th Moscow International Salon of Inventions and Innovation Technologies "Archimedes-2012".

Mar 23 2012
Arbitration Appeal Court rules in favour of Sojuzpatents client Gilmar S.p.A. (Italy) on Trademark ICEBERG

The Fifteenth Arbitration Appeal Court ruled in favour of Sojuzpatent’s client Gilmar S.p.A. (Italy) (plaintiff) and affirmed the decision of the Arbitration Court of the Rostov Region with regard to the trademark “ICEBERG”. 

Feb 29 2012
Moscow Arbitration Court rules in favour of Sojuzpatents client Soremartec S.A. (Belgium)

Moscow Arbitration Court  ruled in favour of Sojuzpatent’s client Soremartec S.A. (Belgium) (plaintiff) in a dispute regarding the infringement of the exclusive rights for international trademark registration No. 1052439.

Feb 28 2012
Arbitration Court of Moscow Region rules in favour of Sojuzpatents client Soremartec S.A. (Belgium)

Arbitration Court of Moscow Region decided in favour of Sojuzpatent’s client Soremartec S.A. (Belgium) (plaintiff) in a dispute regarding an infringement of the exclusive rights for international trademark registration No. 1052439. 

Feb 21 2012
Volga-Vyatskiy District Arbitration Court rules in favour of Sojuzpatents client Soremartec S.A. (Belgium) on Trademark Δ

Federal Arbitration Court of the Volga-Vyatskiy District took a decision in favour of Sojuzpatent’s client Soremartec S.A. (Belgium) (plaintiff) in a dispute regarding an infringement of the exclusive rights for Russian trademark registration No. 395732. 

Feb 21 2012
Arbitration Appeal Court rules in favour of Sojuzpatents client Soremartec S.A. (Belgium)

The Ninth Arbitration Appeal Court of Moscow decided in favour of Sojuzpatent’s client Soremartec S.A. (Belgium) (plaintiff) in a dispute regarding an infringement of exclusive rights for the Russian registration No. 368144.

Feb 21 2012
Moscow Arbitration Court rules in favour of Sojuzpatents client JSC Gedeon Richter (Hungary)

Moscow Arbitration Court ruled in favour of Sojuzpatent’s client JSC Gedeon Richter (Hungary) (defendant) and refused in full to satisfy the claims of plaintiff Bayer Pharma Aktiengesellschaft (Germany). 

Feb 21 2012
Moscow Arbitration Court rules in favour of Sojuzpatents client Soremartec S.A. (Belgium)

Moscow Arbitration Court  ruled in favour of Sojuzpatent’s client Soremartec S.A. (Belgium) (plaintiff) in a dispute regarding an infringement of the exclusive rights for international trademark registration No. 1052439. 

Feb 2 2012
Moscow District Federal Arbitration Court rules in favour of Sojuzpatents client - Liqui-Moly (Germany)

Federal Arbitration Court for Moscow District ruled in favour of Sojuzpatent’s client - Liqui-Moly (Germany) (plaintiff) in an infringement case with regard to the trademark “SINTOIL”.

Dec 26 2011
The Chamber for the Patent Disputes of the Federal Service for Intellectual Property took ​​a Decision in favour of Sojuzpatents client - company SALUS Pharma GmbH (Germany)

 December 26, 2011 the Chamber for the Patent Disputes of the Federal Service for Intellectual Property took ​​a Decision in favour of Sojuzpatent’s client - company SALUS Pharma GmbH (Germany) and refused to satisfy the application of LLC "Tradeservice" for early termination of legal protection in the Russian Federation of the international trademark registration No. 432113 the right holder of which is SALUS Pharma GmbH.

Dec 5 2011
September 20, 2011 the Appeal Arbitration Court for the Ninth Circuit ruled in favor of our client Liqui-Moly Gesellschaft mit beschranker Haftung (Germany)

September 20, 2011 the Appeal Arbitration Court for the Ninth Circuit ruled in favor of our client “Liqui-Moly Gesellschaft mit beschranker Haftung” (Germany) in trademark infringement case on international registration trademark No. 767230

Dec 5 2011
September 23, 2011 the Arbitration Court of Novosibirsk Region ruled in favor of our client Ferrero S.P.A. (Italy)

September 23, 2011 the Arbitration Court of Novosibirsk Region ruled in favor of our client “Ferrero S.P.A.” (Italy) in trademark infringement case on international registration trademarks No. 783985 and No. 486994

Dec 5 2011
October 24, 2011 the Appeal Arbitration Court for the First Circuit ruled in favor of our client Soremartec S.A. (Belgium)

October 24, 2011 the Appeal Arbitration Court for the First Circuit ruled in favor of our client “Soremartec S.A.” (Belgium) (Plaintiff) in trademark infringement case on Russian trademark 395732

Dec 5 2011
November 15, 2011 the Arbitration Court of Novosibirsk Region ruled in favor of our client Ferrero S.P.A. (Italy)

November 15, 2011 the Arbitration Court of Novosibirsk Region ruled in favor of our client “Ferrero S.P.A.” (Italy) (Plaintiff) in trademark infringement case on international registration trademarks No. 783985 and No. 486994 

Dec 5 2011
November 22, 2011 the Moscow Arbitration Court ruled in favor of our client Dyson Limited (Great Britain)

November 22, 2011 the Moscow Arbitration Court ruled in favor of our client “Dyson Limited” (Great Britain) (Plaintiff) in patent infringement case on patent RU 73877 

Dec 5 2011
November 14, 2011 the Appeal Arbitration Court for Ninth Circuit ruled in favor of our client

November 14, 2011 the Appeal Arbitration Court for Ninth Circuit ruled in favor of our client «Chemical resource-and energy saving technology» Ltd. (Plaintiff) in trademark infringement case on Russian trademark No. 409019

Oct 13 2011
August 25, 2011 the Moscow City Arbitrazh Court ruled in favor of our client - LLC "Chemical resource - and energy-saving technology"

August 25, 2011 the Moscow City Arbitrazh Court ruled in favor of our client - LLC "Chemical resource - and energy-saving technology" in trademark RF 409019

Oct 13 2011
The Moscow City Arbitrazh Court ruled in favor of our client Seiko Epson Corporation (Japan)

July 25, 2011 the Moscow City Arbitrazh Court ruled in favor of our client Seiko Epson Corporation (Japan) in patent infringement case on Russian patent 2344043 (container for printing material). The Judge decided to destroy the counterfeit printer cartridges distributed in Russia by Defendant -IKS-Technology and to collect damages.

Oct 13 2011
August 11, 2010 the Chamber for the Patent Disputes of the Russian Federal Service for Intellectual Property

August 11, 2010 the Chamber for the Patent Disputes of the Russian Federal Service for Intellectual Property considered opposition against validity in the territory of the Russian Federation of Eurasian patent 00891 “dosing inhaler for propionate of fluticasone” and opposition against validity in the territory of the Russian Federation of Eurasian patent 00892 “dosing inhaler for salmeterol”. The Board Meeting of the Chamber for the Patent Disputes took a decision in favor of Sojuzpatent’s client – LLC Laicenteck, satisfying the opposition and recognizing Eurasian patents 00891 and 00892 completely invalid in the territory of the Russian Federation.

Oct 13 2011
August 15, 2011 the Appeal Arbitration Court for Ninth Circuit ruled in favor of our client Seiko Epson Corporation (Japan) in patent infringement case on Russian patent 2336175 and affirmed the Decision of the Moscow Arbitration Court as of June 1, 2011 according to which the Court decided to destroy the counterfeit printer cartridges distributed in Russia by Defendant - IKS-Technology and to collect damages. August 15, 2011 the Appeal Arbitration Court for Ninth Circuit ruled in favor of our client Seiko Epson Corporation (Japan) in patent infringement case on Russian patent 2336175 and affirmed the Decision of the Moscow Arbitration Court as of June 1, 2011 according to which the Court decided to destroy the counterfeit printer cartridges distributed in Russia by Defendant - IKS-Technology and to collect damages.
Pages:  1    2    3    4    5    6    7    8    9    10    11    12    13  

Legal address:
5/2, Il`inka str.,
Moscow, Russia, 109012

Post address:
h.13, b.5, Myasnitskaya str.
Moscow, Russia, 101000

Phones:
+7 (495) 221-88-80, 221-88-81

Faxes:
+7 (495) 221-88-85, 221-88-86

E-mail:
info@sojuzpatent.com

Company news
Dec 26 2017

 The Court for Intellectual Property Rights approved an amicable agreement in favor of Sojuzpatent’s client – Mandarin Oriental Services B.V. (the Netherlands) in a trademark  non-use cancelation case.

Read more
Nov 3 2017

The Ninth Arbitration Appeal Court ruled in favor of Sojuzpatent’s client – RENAULT s.a.s. (France) in an administrative infringement case. 

Read more
Oct 12 2017

The Ninth Arbitration Appeal Court ruled in favor of Sojuzpatent’s client – RENAULT s.a.s. (France) in an administrative infringement case. 

Read more

Read all news